Related Companies
|
[]
|
||||||||
Related Funds
|
[]
|
||||||||
English
|
|||||||||
oda_LawsuitAgainstCompanyOrDevelopmentsInTheLawsuitAgainstCompanyAbstract|
|
|
||||||||
oda_UpdateAnnouncementFlag|
|
|
Evet (Yes)
|
|||||||
oda_CorrectionAnnouncementFlag|
|
|
Hayır (No)
|
|||||||
oda_DateOfThePreviousNotificationAboutTheSameSubject|
|
|
13.07.2018 (made by Kipa)
|
|||||||
oda_DelayedAnnouncementFlag|
|
|
Hayır (No)
|
|||||||
oda_AnnouncementContentSection|
|
|
||||||||
oda_DateOfLawsuit|
|
|
08.05.2018
|
|||||||
oda_NotificationDateOfLawsuitToCompany|
|
|
13.07.2018
|
|||||||
oda_SubjectOfLawsuit|
|
|
Cancellation of Kipa General Assembly decisions dated 27.04.2018
|
|||||||
oda_CounterpartiesOfLawsuit|
|
|
Jak Esim
|
|||||||
oda_LawsuitAmount|
|
|
-
|
|||||||
oda_RatioOfLawsuitAmountToTotalAssetsDisclosedInLatestFinancialStatementsOfEntity|
|
|
-
|
|||||||
oda_RelavantCourtAndFileNumber|
|
|
T.C. Karşıyaka Commercial Court (File number: 2018/366)
|
|||||||
oda_TrialDate|
|
|
-
|
|||||||
oda_Decision|
|
|
-
|
|||||||
oda_NextTrialDate|
|
|
03.07.2019
|
|||||||
oda_AmountOfProvisionInFinancialStatementsIfAny|
|
|
-
|
|||||||
oda_EffectToOperationsOfCompany|
|
|
-
|
|||||||
oda_ExplanationSection|
|
|
||||||||
oda_ExplanationTextBlock|
|
The expert report dated 10.06.2019 on the lawsuit numbered 2018/366 E., regarding the cancellation of Kipa Ticaret A.Ş. General Assembly meeting dated 27.04.2018, filed by Jak Esim at Karşıyaka Commercial Court, has been received by our Company on 12.06.2019. In the expert report, it was stated that "i) The call (for the general assembly) in terms of the entity which made the call, the form of the call and the quorum are made in accordance with the law, Kipa Ticaret A.Ş.'s articles of association, ii) due to the fact that there is no specific instruction as to the address/location of general assembly in Kipa Ticaret A.Ş's Internal Directives, there is no harm to convene the general assembly in a location within the boundaries of civil administration in which the headquarters of the entity that made the call is residing. iii) The items in the agenda were discussed at the General Assembly, shareholders asked questions regarding agenda items and answers were provided iv) the decisions were taken by majority of votes in general, there are no evidence or records suggesting these decisions were against the law, articles of association or against good faith. v) there is no evidence that these decisions were taken by holding the shareholders under undue influence or coercion. vi) even though some of the written or verbal question by shareholders are deemed to be outside of the agenda, the answers were provided in 15 days following the General Assembly meeting". (In case of a discrepancy between the Turkish and the English versions of this disclosure, the Turkish version shall prevail.) |
We proclaim that our above disclosure is in conformity with the principles set down in “Material Events Communiqué” of Capital Markets Board, and it fully reflects all information coming to our knowledge on the subject matter thereof, and it is in conformity with our books, records and documents, and all reasonable efforts have been shown by our Company in order to obtain all information fully and accurately about the subject matter thereof, and we’re personally liable for the disclosures.